Progressive Railroading

RAIL EMPLOYMENT
Newsletter Sign Up
Stay updated on news, articles and information for the rail industry


All fields are required.





Rail News Home BNSF Railway

December 2009



Rail News: BNSF Railway

Buffett's secular bet on BNSF & the 'Rail Renaissance'



By Tony Hatch

The "Sage of Omaha" placed more of his chips on Fort Worth, offering $100 per share for the 77 percent of Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corp. that he didn't own, or a solid 30 percent premium to the pre-announcement price, valuing the enterprise at $44 billion.

The price might seem rich if you're looking at the economy through a near-term prism, but the actual forward (2010 consensus) multiple compares well with past deals — including the recent short-line offerings. Warren's elephant deal follows his $4.5 billion purchase of Marmon Holdings Inc. in late 2007, so he already was moving toward rail industry ownership. This obviously reflects well on the industry as a whole, and on the tempering fears of over-aggressive re-regulation. A few additional thoughts:

  • This should face no real regulatory or congressional scrutiny — it's a change in stock ownership, not competitive position, and Buffett long has been a friend of government. The last comparable event was the Chicago & North Western leveraged buyout back in the '80s. But this deal also can be viewed as a positive bet on "re-regulation" by a well-connected and driven performer of due-diligence. Buffett will be selling his other rail holdings: Union Pacific Corp. and Norfolk Southern Corp.
  • The case for private ownership of railroads is compelling: The tension between short-term outlook (and quarterly performance) and long-term capex (assets that last 50 years or more) means that a privately held company might be able to act strategically more often, although the rails have been moving in that direction (see their capex in this recession).
  • Many major private-equity firms analyzed and even approached rails during the last boom (circa 2006); rails rebuffed their advances, and some of those P.E. firms are in difficult straits today. Although couched in the guise of a "patriotic investment" in the U.S. economy (it is that), it is also a shrewd bet on a rail-renaissance leader at a cyclical low point — and when rival bidders able to outspend Mr. Buffett are few and far between and/or nonexistent. BNSF actually is the most global of the U.S. rails, with one-third of its business coming from intermodal, and half of that in international boxes from Asia (which might not be seen as patriotic by some).
  • BNSF could can gain a competitive advantage, presuming it's able to better plan its capital cycle. It certainly wouldn't hurt to have a connected owner. Another presumption: that Mr. Buffett will let management do its thing, which he's typically done, post-acquisition. How might the industry benefit? It already has: A perceived heroic/patriotic investor owns a Class I railroad, rather than "greedy Wall Street types." And whatever the irony, changing the paradigm in D.C. would benefit the industry — and the nation.
  • It's also an interesting bet by Buffett on federal government actions — not just on "re-reg" but on coal, from someone accustomed to help fashion the debate in D.C.

Again, this is only partially "an all-in bet on the American economy" — it is a secular bet on rail and on BNSF, and purchased rather cheaply. So, to answer the question we've been asked so often: I know why Warren is buying.

Tony Hatch is an independent transportation industry analyst and consultant.



Keywords

Browse articles on Warren Buffett BNSF Matt Rose rail renaissance

Contact Progressive Railroading editorial staff.